PML-N leader Rana Sanaullah had a calm demeanour on Tuesday in the National Assembly, where he invited the PTI to officially hold political dialogue with the government, especially in light of the committee formed by the party.
Since PTI founder Imran Khan’s incarceration last year based on several cases, his party’s relationship with the government, as well as the establishment, has turned exceedingly sour. The PTI has held several protests over the last year, most of which escalated into violence after facing state repression.
On Nov 24, Imran issued a “final call” for nationwide protests, demanding the restoration of the PTI’s electoral mandate, the release of detained party members, and the reversal of the 26th Amendment which he said had strengthened a “dictatorial regime”.
The protest once again turned violent as PTI supporters clashed with security forces, resulting in the hasty retreat of the party’s top leadership from the Red Zone in the early hours of Nov 27. At least six people, including a policeman and three Rangers officials, were killed in the protest. Following the debacle, Imran constituted a five-member committee for holding negotiations with ‘anyone’.
Speaking in the National Assembly today, Sanaulllah recalled that when Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif was in the house a few weeks ago, he exchanged pleasantries with the opposition and extended an invitation to sit down and have talks. He, however, lamented the response and tone used by Opposition Leader Omar Ayub Khan.
The political adviser also recalled that before PTI’s Nov 24 power show, the party was offered Sangjani as a venue instead of the planned D-Chowk protest, “but that call was not heeded.” He regretted the loss of lives on both sides, referring to those in uniform and those without.
“Now, if [PTI leader] Sher Afzal Marwat is claiming we didn’t have any conversations, then maybe conversation didn’t happen from that side either,” he said.
“But this is a reality that in this parliamentary democratic system; until the opposition leader and leader of the house don’t sit and have dialogue, this system cannot work,” he said, stressing that “both wheels need to turn for the car to move forward”.
Sanaullah emphasised that despite cases being made against PML-N members and its leaders being sent to jail, the call for dialogue was extended. “If there is no dialogue between political parties and forces, the matter will not move forward.”
“I request Marwat sahib that if you have made this committee for conversation with us — which you have not said a word about till this day —then officially come and say you have formed this committee for dialogue with the government or PML-N or allied parties.
Sanaullah noted that the statement put forward by Marwat indicated that a committee has been formed for talks, and whoever wants to hold conversations can proceed to do it.
He went on to emphasise that the office of the House’s speaker was a “neutral venue”.
“It is as much ours as it is yours, and current speaker Sardar Ayaz Sadiq has always maintained his neutrality,” he said.
Sanaullah remarked that oftentimes, “one thing is said within a political party, and then another member says something according to what he thinks, and the meaning of that is something else.”
“Marwat sahib, if you find it suitable, I request that your committee at least sends and official serious message to the government that there is a committee [for talks].
“Don’t be constrained to TV talk shows and press releases, go and tell them there is this committee and we are serious and want political dialogue,” Sanaullah said.
He was optimistic that if this suggestion was implemented, it would definitely yield results.
More to follow
