NA session underway to pass 26th constitutional amendment bill after Senate approval – Pakistan

Table of Contents

After the Senate passed the 26th Constitution Amendment Bill 2024 with a two-thirds majority on Sunday evening, a session of the National Assembly (NA) is now underway to pass the bill.

The government requires 224 votes to pass the bill and enact it into law.

The bill, better known as the Consti­tutional Package, is legislation proposing a set of constitutional amendments, including the fixture of the chief justice’s term. A special parliamentary committee formed last month — which had the representation of all parties, including the PTI — had been discussing various proposals.

26th Constitutional Amendment Bill by shahzeb ahmed on Scribd

The minister said that he and the attorney general will also be a part of the commission.

“Marginalised communities and those whose fundamental rights need to be enforced, such as women and minorities, will be appointed by the National Assembly Speaker,” he added. “We will also bring in someone from outside parliament as a technocrat, who can provide input based on their experience.”

In terms of the provincial judiciary, Tarar also said a performance evaluation system was being introduced to assess the performance of judges.

“People complain that their cases are pending for up to 10 years,” he said. “This judicial commission needs to enforce a nationwide standard, so the performance of high court judges will be evaluated.”

Tarar continued: “We need to appreciate the judges who perform well, but in the past, we have received complaints that after confirmation, their work is inadequate. We need to ensure that taxpayers’ money is being well spent, and when the judiciary is receiving such perks, we expect results.

“Cases where there is inefficiency will be referred to the Supreme Judicial Council,” he added.

Clauses passed and votes

  • Clause 2 (Insertion of Article 9A [clean and healthy environment]) — 65 for, 4 against
  • Clause 3 (Amendment to Article 48 [president to act on advice]) — 65 for, 0 against
  • Clause 4 (Amendment to Article 81 [expenditure charged upon Federal Consolidated Fund]) — 65 for, 0 against
  • Clause 5 (Amendment to Article 111 [right to speak in Provincial
    Assembly]) — 65 for, 0 against
  • Clause 7 (Amendment to Article 177 [appointment of Supreme Court
    Judges]) — 65 for, 0 against
  • Clause 8 (Amendment to Article 179 [retiring age]) — 65 for, 0 against
  • Clause 9 (Amendment to Article 184 [Original Jurisdiction of Supreme
    Court]) — 65 for, 0 against
  • Clause 10 (Amendment to Article 185 [Appellate jurisdiction of
    Supreme Court]) — 65 for, 0 against
  • Clause 11 (Amendment to Article 186A [power of Supreme Court to
    transfer cases]) — 65 for, 0 against
  • Clause 12 (Amendment to Article 187 [issue and execution of processes
    of Supreme Court]) — 65 for, 0 against
  • Clause 14 (Amendment to Article 193 [Appointment of High Court
    Judges]) — 65 for, 0 against
  • Clause 15 (Amendment to Article 199 [Jurisdiction of High Court]) — 65
    for, 0 against
  • Clause 17 (Amendment to Article 208 [Officers and servants of
    Courts]) — 65 for, 0 against
  • Clause 18 (Substitution of Article 209 [Supreme Judicial Council) — 65
    for, 0 against
  • Clause 19 (Amendment to Article 215 [Term of office of Commissioner])
    65 for, 0 against
  • Clause 20 (Amendment to Article 255 [Oath of Office]) — 65 for, 0
    against
  • Clause 21 (Amendment to Article 259 [Awards]) — 65 for, 0 against
  • Clause 22 (Amendment to the Fourth Schedule of the Constitution) — 65
    for, 0 against

Amended/ Inserted clauses

  • Clause 2A — amendment moved by Kamran Murtaza, Maulana Attaul Rehman and Maulvi Abdul Wasay (Amendment of Article 38, to eliminate riba completely before the first day of January 2028) — 65 for, 0 against

  • Clause 6 — amendment moved by Azam Nazeer Tarar (Amendment to
    Article 175A, entry iii may be read as entry ii; iii shall be
    read as “Most senior judge of the Constitutional Bench”.) — 65 for, 0 against

  • Clause 13 — amendment moved by Azam Nazeer Tarar (Insertion of
    Article 191A [Constitutional Benches of the Supreme Court], clause 2
    of 191A may be substituted and read as such: “The most senior judge
    amongst judges nominated under clause 1 may be called the most senior
    judge of the constitutional benches”; in clause 3B, the words “passed
    under Article 199” will be removed; in clause 4, “presiding” will be
    replaced by “most senior judge of the constitutional benches”.) — 65
    for, 0 against

  • Clause 16 — amendment moved by Azam Nazeer Tarar (Insertion of
    Article 202A [Constitutional Benches of High Courts] – in clause 5,
    “subject to clause 7” will be inserted; new clause 7 shall be
    inserted which states, “This article shall come into force if, in
    respect of the Islamabad High Court, both houses of parliament during
    joint sitting; and a high court the respective provincial assembly
    through a resolution passed by a majority of the total joint
    sitting/respective provincial assembly give effect to the provisions
    of this article.”) — 65 for, 0 against

  • Clause 16A — amendment moved by Kamran Murtaza, Maulana Attaul Rehman and Moulvi Abdul Wasay (Amendment to Article 203C [The Federal
    Shariat Court] – after the words “high court” the words “a judge of
    federal shariat court qualified to be a judge of the Supreme Court”
    will be added.) — 65 for, 0 against

  • Clause 16B —amendment moved by Kamran Murtaza, Maulana Attaul Rehman and Moulvi Abdul Wasay (Amendment to Article 203D [Powers,
    jurisdiction and functions of the Court] — new proviso: provided
    further that appeal against decisions given after the commencement of
    Constitution [26 Amendment] Act, 2024 shall be disposed of within 12
    months, within which the decision will take effect unless ordered
    otherwise by the Supreme Court.“) — 65 for, 0 against

  • Clause 19A — amendment moved by Kamran Murtaza, Maulana Attaul Rehman and Moulvi Abdul Wasay (Amendment to Article 229 [Reference to
    Islamic Council] — “Two-fifths” shall be substituted for
    “one-fourth”.) — 65 for, 0 against

  • Clause 19B — 19A — amendment moved by Kamran Murtaza, Maulana Attaul Rehman and Moulvi Abdul Wasay (Amendment to Article 230 [Functions of the Islamic Council] — new proviso: provided that final reports in any case shall be considered within 12 after it has been late.) — 65 for, 0 against

harassed and intimidated, the PTI cannot vote for this bill,” Gohar declared.

Expressing gratitude to the JUI-F chief for his role in the process, Gohar said that the party will attend parliament today and has “no objections” if Fazl votes on the bill. He also demanded “the return” of PTI lawmakers who have been allegedly abducted.

“We will deliver a speech on the assembly floor, but we will not vote on the 26th amendment.”

Source Link

Website | + posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Skip to content