Paved with good intentions but potholed with reality – Pakistan

Table of Contents

Karachi’s great experiment with new construction materials is testing the limits of water damage to roads.

For at least two decades, Hijri Road has been a nuisance for the people who live in Gulshan Town’s Metroville Colony.

So when UC 6 chairman Nasir Ashfaq managed to get the Karachi Development Authority to fix the inner neighbourhood service lane, they insisted on paver blocks this time. Three years later, sewerage still overflows from time to time, but at least by the time they clean it up there is still a road underneath the muck.

“When we installed pavers, we’ve seen that the lifespan of the road increases,” said the UC chairman. “The problem hasn’t resurfaced.”

Neighbourhood after neighbourhood is switching to the newer technology. End of last year, Mayor Murtaza Wahab even announced a Rs281 million push to redo roads in District Central alone.

“Paver work … is now a preferred option for local union council level leadership because of its sustainability,” Wahab told Dawn.

The success of an experiment at a nasty spot on the well-worn 26th Street persuaded the city government it was making the right choice. And if you take the FTC flyover from Gora Qabristan and exit on to Sharea Faisal, you’ll notice the difference there too.

These two spots would keep ponding no matter how many times the city patched them up. But since these strips were done over in blocks in 2022, there has been a marked difference.

A bigger experiment for an entire underpass at Gulistan-i-Jauhar was undertaken a year later. The decision raised eyebrows at the time, but the mayor defended it as a solution to persistent water damage. But when should pavers ideally be used in Karachi, and is this construction material actually a solution to one of this city’s worst problems: potholes?

became popular when clay bricks fell short as Europe patched itself back together again after WWII.

The Netherlands introduced them in 1951, Brazil has relied on them for entire favelas, and use has doubled in the United States every five years. And according to Farhad Jatoi, the managing director at Magnacrete, pavers have long been tested in far more demanding environments such as ports and steel mills.

Karachi began using them under very different pressures. When a road is not designed or levelled properly, rainwater or sewerage tends to sit on it. This eats away at the top coat of asphalt. Potholes appear in days, even on new roads.

The engineers needed to keep the city’s roads in working condition and could not keep repairing them every time a gutter overflowed. They couldn’t wait for Karachi’s entire drainage to be fixed either.

And so when the Umar Sharif underpass was repeatedly breaking down, they decided to fix it once and for all by patching it with pavers. The same approach was taken for Jehangir Road, which would keep flooding with sewage because it is about 2 feet lower than its surrounding areas.

“We only install them in places where there’s subsoil water, leaking sewerage lines, or underground cross-connections causing repeated damage,” said one of the city government’s senior engineers, Ishrat Rehan. Pavers are the response to chronic drainage failures, even if they are a “majburi” for a city with few workable choices.

As per the Karachi Metropolitan Corporation’s latest progress report of the district Annual Development Programme, at least Rs4.2 billion were sanctioned for paver-related work in the city, with District Central seeing the largest share of around Rs1.13bn. The data, however, did not include figures from Districts Malir and Keamari.

pounds per square inch, or how much crushing force the block can handle before it breaks). Pavers may be cheaper, but experts argue comparing prices isn’t enough.

Engineer Rehan presented this math: The wearing course for asphalt (the top layer of the road that comes in direct contact with traffic) costs about Rs150 per square foot. The binder layer (the base that provides structural support) is around Rs95. That comes to Rs245 per square foot. Pavers, on the other hand, cost around Rs230.

The assumption that pavers are a cheaper alternative is challenged. Urban planner Bilal Khalid argues that you may save initially, but in the long run, maintenance will still set you back.

“The initial cost of pavers is roughly 50pc to even 100pc higher than asphalt,” said Khalid. “If we assume they are cheaper in terms of maintenance, the issue is that wear and tear of bricks also increases, especially if they are subjected to loads beyond their design capacity.” Repeated cracking and displacement, he suggested, could undermine any perceived savings.

Pavers can last 8 to 10 years if they have a compressive strength of 5,000 to 7,000 PSI. But if you go to lower PSIs, those blocks can wear out quickly. Well-installed pavers (7,000 PSI) with proper interlocking and consistent bedding can take heavy vehicular loads.

A study by Denmark’s Aalborg University has found that while pavers can help manage surface runoff, they are not the longest-lasting or cheapest options for roads. They can require significant maintenance and, in some cases, partial reconstruction within six to seven years, a lifespan many people consider too short compared to conventional road surfaces.

As an alternative, Khalid suggested reviving the city’s own asphalt production and maintenance capacity. “Today, those plants are dysfunctional,” he said. “Reactivating them, either through public resources or public-private partnerships, could provide a more sustainable solution”

Part of Garden Road alongside Karachi zoo lined with paver bricks. — Photo by author

Gulistan-i-Jauhar’s underpass experiment

Public opinion, as far as a quick street survey could reveal, is mixed on whether paving the Gulistan-i-Jauhar underpass was a good decision.

Some people who use it, such as Muhammad Owais, have road snobbery. He reached the conclusion that you shouldn’t use paver blocks if you want to make a “proper” road. Pavers are just meant for footpaths.

“I went through [the Gulistan-i-Jauhar underpass] once, and my bike ended up in such bad condition that I never used it again,” he said, explaining that he just uses the overhead bridge despite traffic congestion.

Rickshaw driver Kifayatullah who uses the route, was more blunt: “This underpass isn’t right,” he said. “Vehicles and bikes are getting damaged here.” He claimed to have witnessed an accident in which two children died.

The primary complaint is that pavers create an uneven surface that is unstable for motorcycles. The vehicle vibrates, its handlebars shake and riders can’t drive in a straight line.

This ‘wobbling’ sound is caused by the friction between the wheel and the paver, explained Professor Noman. This can make pavers shift from their position, which can leave gaps that can derail a vehicle. Another hazard is loose pavers or kerb blocks at the end of the median or when the edges are not tightly fitted.

Bykea rider Muhammad Jan dismissed the criticism entirely as a frequent user of the underpass. “It’s completely fine; first class,” he said. “There’s no problem at all.” Others felt it saved time, and at least even after the recent rains, you did not have potholes that gave you punctures.

The project engineer, who requested anonymity, said the decision to use paver blocks was driven by site conditions, particularly water flow and gradient.

“Standing at Jauhar Chowrangi and looking towards Samama, [you will see] there is a significant height difference of around 22 feet,” he told Dawn.

“When rainwater flows down from that height, its velocity is very high. If we had used asphalt, the force of that water would have stripped it away in the first heavy rain.”

They chose pavers because they are more resistant to water damage and can withstand high-velocity runoff. “We’ve used 8,000 PSI strength pavers here,” he added. “Nothing will happen to them for 20 to 25 years.”

The project’s contractor, Sherjan Mosakhail, did not respond to a request for comment.

Underpass built using paver bricks in Gulistan-i-Jauhar. — Photo by author

However, in an article published in 2023, following the construction of the underpass, urban planner Muhammad Toheed had argued that the perceived lack of attention to quality in the construction had led to accusations that the contractors prioritised personal financial gain over the welfare of the public.

“Residents are avoiding the underpass, which is supposed to be a faster, signal-free corridor, and opting for longer routes instead,” he wrote. “In essence, the millions, if not billions of rupees spent on the underpass are being under-utilised at best and wasted at worst.”

Speaking to Dawn, Toheed suggested that contractors, instead of need-based assessments, sometimes influence infrastructure decisions.

“The contractor says that this road should be built again, and the same contractor is awarded the project,” he alleged, adding that the sudden visibility of certain materials and suppliers raises questions about procurement practices.

Source Link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Skip to content